Skip navigation links
NASA Glenn Research Center

+ NASA Home
+ Glenn Home
Go
ABOUT NASA NEWS AND EVENTS MULTIMEDIA MISSIONS POPULAR TOPICS MyNASA

Multidisciplinary
Design, Analysis, and
Optimization Branch
Home
About Us
Top Stories
Reference Material
Education
Search Glenn Research Center
Go
EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES: THE NASA AEROQUIZ

 
Week of 11/2/98:
 
Q: In 1922, fantasy author Edgar Rice Burroughs wrote At the Earth's Core; a story of a hollow Earth kingdom called Pellucidar. In the story, adventurers drilled their way into the Earth. As they went ever deeper, the force of gravity reversed direction, and they began climbing "up" into the land of Pellucidar. When they "surfaced," they stood upright inside the hollow shell of the Earth, held there by the gravity generated by the mass of Earth directly beneath them. Assuming the Earth really is a hollow shell, would gravitation work that way?
 
A: No. In fact, it can be shown that there is no net force of gravity at all inside a hollow Earth! The mass of the Earth directly under your feet would indeed generate a gravitational force on you (as Burroughs surmised), but so would the mass of Earth far over your head. Although the mass over your head is far away, there is a lot more of it than the mass under your feet. For a perfect spherical shell, you can mathematically show that the net force of gravity is zero. In "reality," there would be small forces acting on you due to mass concentrations within the Earth's crust, the centrifugal force of the Earth spinning (about 0.3% of a "gee" at the equator), and because the Earth is an imperfect sphere. But Burroughs was wrong -- You would float in Pellucidar!
 
Congratulations to John D. Winstel.
 

 
Week of 11/9/98:
 
Q: Last week's question made us realize how the Earth's gravity is often misunderstood. For an object in orbit around the Earth, the equations of motion for its trajectory can be solved analytically if one assumes that the Earth is a "point mass." That is, an assumption is made that all of the Earth's mass is concentrated at a single point right at the Earth's center. This simplifies the equations of motion such that they can be solved on the back of an envelope. This week's question: how good is the "point mass" assumption?
 
A: Luckily, gravity from a spherical mass (like a planet or a star) can be simply described. The force of attraction on, say a satellite in Earth orbit, is calculated by starting with the formula for Newton's law of gravitation. The force from the satellite to the Earth is integrated across all of Earth's "mass elements" in all directions. Since a sphere is symmetric, it's easy to visualize that all forces acting normal to lines between the satellite and the Earth cancel each other. When the simplified integration is carried out, it is seen that the gravitational attraction of the Earth is the same as if all of the Earth's mass were concentrated at a single point! This is not only true of homogeneous spheres, but it's also true for spheres with spherically symmetric (onion-like) shells of variable density, like the Earth. Non-spherical objects with distributed mass do not behave this way, and orbits around them would be very complex and would require computational methods to describe them. Indeed, even the Earth is an imperfect sphere with some mass concentrations, and small corrections to the "point mass" approach are required for very precise calculations.
 
No one got the correct answer!
- The Aeroquiz Editor.

 

 
Week of 11/16/98:
 
Q: This week, the Earth will pass through fresh debris left by comet Tempel-Tuttle, providing viewers with the most intense meteor shower in 33 years. Since the biggest pieces are only the size of sand, the meteors will easily burn up in the atmosphere and will pose no threat to anyone on Earth. Experts, however, are very concerned about damage to satellites in Earth orbit. At more than 150,000 miles per hour, a small grain can carry the destructive force of a .22-caliber bullet. Although the meteoroids can poke holes in solar panels, pit lenses, and blast off reflective coatings, experts are more concerned about another kind of damage. What is it?
 
A: The damage that is more harmful is the static electricity that is discharged when the particles hit the satellite. It can cause the satellite to lose all electrical power.
 
Congratulations to Jack Felici.

 
Given the high velocity of the Leonid meteoroids, their impact is an order of magnitude larger when compared with typical background sporadic meteoroids. The impact on orbiting satellites could be both mechanical and electrical. Electrical damage could occur when meteoroids disintegrate upon impact with the spacecraft. This could generate a plasma cloud as a result of ionization, which could lead to electrostatic discharge on adjacent surfaces.
- The Aeroquiz Editor.

 

 
Week of 11/23/98:
 
Q: When machine guns are used in aviation dogfights, incendiary tracer bullets are often mixed with the ordinary bullets at regular intervals. The incendiary coatings (often red phosphorus) ignite at about five hundred degrees Fahrenheit as the tracers exit the muzzle, allowing the pilot to see where the bullets are going. However, if the pilot aims exactly at where the tracers are going, he is guaranteed to miss with the bulk of his ammunition! Why?
 
A: The combustion of the coating alters the surrounding airflow, and the trajectories of the incendiary bullets are different than the ordinary bullets.
 
Congratulations to Nicolas Cousinea.

 
Tracer bullets provide a good example of drag reduction via "base burning." The red phosphorus combustion effectively pressurizes the flat rear base of the tracer bullet (an area that would otherwise be a low-pressure recirculation zone) and greatly reduces its "base drag." The tracer bullets fly significantly farther than ordinary bullets.
- The Aeroquiz Editor.

 

 
Week of 11/30/98:
 
Q: In many conceptual designs for hypersonic airbreathing aircraft, the vehicle's fuel flow rate requirement is often much more than what the engine can effectively burn. In some flight regimes, it can be several times the fuel flow rate required for complete combustion. Why?
 
A: The fuel is the only heat sink available. The heat loads are huge. Evaporation is very likely required. So, keep the fuel flowing whether you need it for propulsion or not, or you will become cooked meat.
 
Congratulations to Joe Eisenberg.

 
Hypersonic speeds produce a very hostile flight environment. The friction of the air on the exterior surface of the vehicle can produce temperatures of several thousand degrees. In virtually all hypersonic airbreathing aircraft designs, fuel is used as a heat sink to cool the hot exterior surfaces of the vehicle and the even more hostile environment around the high-speed engines. If the flight speed is sufficiently high, the fuel demand for vehicle and engine cooling is higher than what the engine needs for combustion.
- The Aeroquiz Editor.

 


USA.Gov - Government Made Easy
 ExpectMore.gov

+ Freedom of Information Act
+ Budgets, Strategic Plans and Accountability Reports
+ The President's Management Agenda
+ NASA Privacy Statement, Disclaimer,
and Accessibility Certification

+ Inspector General Hotline
+ Equal Employment Opportunity Data Posted
Pursuant to the No Fear Act

+ Information-Dissemination Priorities and Inventories
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Page Curator: Jeff Berton
NASA Official: Robert Plencner
Last Updated: August 4, 2008